Ted Cruz Just Gave the Perfect Response to Establishment Critics VIDEO


Original Post: Ted Cruz Just Gave the Perfect Response to Establishment Critics VIDEO.

The 9 percent who belong to the oligarchical political class hate the rest of us—except when they’re eating from our tables like rabid Vietnamese Potbelly Pigs. The establishment’s latest target: Texas Senator Ted Cruz. Fox’s Bret Baier asked Senator Cruz about critics like George Will and Charles Krauthammer who say Cruz doesn’t understand Washington’s rules: Congressional politics is a team […]

The post Ted Cruz Just Gave the Perfect Response to Establishment Critics VIDEO appeared first on Hennessy's View.

The Bundy Ranch Is Under Attack Again . . .


And so is almost 3 million surrounding acres of land, in southern Nevada.


You just new the BLM wouldn’t go away quietly after they turned tail last spring and left the site of the Bundy Ranch standoff. On October 10, 2014 the Federal Registry identified most of southern Nevada Areas of Critical Environmental Concern. (ACEC) It seems the endangered desert turtle defense has risen from the dead.

In this urgent message from Carol Bundy, she outlines the steps being taken against the Bundy family and the other land owners in Nevada. Makes you kind of wonder what plans Harry Reid has for all that prime ranching real estate.


On Friday October 10th, 2014 a Notice from the federal registry reveals that the federal government is mounting retaliations against the Bundy family and the Southern Nevada people.

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No.197 Notice, outlines plans to make the Bundy ranch and most of the rest of Southern Nevada, Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACECs). 90 days from October 10th, 2014 these proposals will become federal law without consent from the Nevada State legislatures or the people of Southern Nevada.

Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACECs) are human restricted management areas. ACECs have been a tool used by the federal government to gain further control of large masses of western lands and the resources.

As proposed, nearly 3 million acres in Southern Nevada will be locked away from the people. This includes most uses on the land (recreational, agricultural or otherwise).

Listed below are just a few of the outlined restriction that come with ACECs:

· Closed Roads

· Excluded Trails

· Closed to Camping

· Closed to Recreational Vehicles

· Closed to Motorized Travel

· Closed to Livestock Grazing

· Restricted Human Hiking

· Restricted Horseback Riding

· Exclude Group Recreations

· Closed to Mineral Development

· Closed to Water Access

· Closed to Hunting / Target Shooting

The Southern Nevada people soon will have less access to their lands than any other people in the history of this country.

There are 33 new Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACECs) proposed to cover Southern Nevada totaling 1,739,795 acres. 12 of the 22 existing ACECs are also proposed to be expanded. (See List Below) The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) filed this lists on October 1st.



Area Acres Area Acres

Big Spring Valley 79,958 Muddy Mountains 228,297

Bitter Spring 61,840 Old SpanishTrail 51,449

California Wash 11,998 Opel Mountains 77,410

Gale Hills / Lovell Wash 4,788 Pahrump Valley 41,770

Grapevine Springs 202 Pahrump Valley to McCullough 274,061

Highland Range 53,015 Perkins Ranch 408

Hiko Wash 708 South Bare Mountains 87,692

Ivanpah Valley 3,134 South Newbury Mountains 26,877

Invanpah Valley 289,599 Specter Hills 6,603

Jean Lake 12,692 Devils Hole Hills 283,538

LaMadre (North & South) 2,431 Spirit Mountain 9,488

Lava Dune 623 Stewart Valley 5,204

Logandale 8,118 Stuart Ranch 278

Lower Mormon Mesa 66,353 Stump Spring 126,952

Mesa Milkyetch 9,183 Upper Las Vegas Wash 22,244

Moapa / Mesquite 2,219 Valley of Fire 131,378

Mt Schader 285 Mormon Mesa 167,594

Virgin River 8,500 Whitney Pockets 160

Armagosa Mesquite 9,650 Arden Sites 1,142

Arrow Canyon 2,070 Ash Meadows 28,202

Big Dune 2,456 Coyote Spring 51,528

Crescent Townsites 435 Devils Throat 848

Gold Butte 346,895 Keyhole Canyon 446

Hidden Valley 3,356 Piute / Eldorado 352,159

Rainbow Gardens 39,366 Red Rock Springs 683

River Mountain 11,029 Stump Springs 646

Total Restricted Acres 2,767,941

This is a direct assault on the State of Nevada. It is also a deliberate retaliation against the people for standing against the horrific action of several federal agencies at the Bundy ranch.

The boldness of the federal government’s timing and action on these matters are astonishing. They are again making a clear case that they are willing to use federal power to punish the local people. Harry Reid’s declaration “This is not over” is proving to be uncharacteristically accurate.

Before the Bundy ranch standoff, there were approximately 1 million acres of ACECs in Southern Nevada. Now after the Bundy standoff, the BLM is proposing an additional 1.8 Million acres (a 280% increase) all of which just happens to be in Southern Nevada.

Although this is not proof, anybody with a little intelligence can see that Harry Reid and the BLM are not protecting the environment; they are punishing their enemies.

How is it that all newly proposed critical environmental land in the Untied States just happens to reside within miles of the Bundy ranch? Is the land in Southern Nevada so different/dangerous/special/delicate and important?

From near the beginning of history, tyrannical men have sought to oppress through the control of land and resources, “Control the land and resources, and you have the power to control the people”. There is a direct correlation to land and resources with power and wealth. All major powers in world history have gained their power & wealth by conquering the land and controlling the resources.

It is self-evident that certain men within our government understand this and have implemented these age-old tactics upon the people of this country. For decades they have used government to gain power & wealth for themselves by controlling the land and resources.

Our founding fathers understood this nature, they drafted the Constitution to protect us from the despotic men that history is so full of. They limited the powers of government by outlining what lands the federal government can control and by separating the powers they hold. Their intent was to quickly dispose the land and resources to the local people, where it is most safe.


Under federal rule, the people that live on or near the land have no say to what happens in their own backyards. They have no republic form of government. The decisions are all made by appointed representatives from Washington D.C. These representatives have no responsibility to the people and there is no practical legal way to hold them accountable. In direct violation of the U.S. Constitution federal agencies use the lands as their own and suppress the rightful stewards.

At the moment of Statehood land inside the new State is no longer U.S. Territory, and no longer does U.S. Congress or any of the federal agencies have authority to dispose of the land or make any rules or regulations respecting to it. At Statehood it becomes the right and duty of the people of the State to dispose of and regulate all the lands within the boarders of that State. This is called a republic form of government, for the people, by the people.

The incident at the Bundy ranch indicates that people are beginning to question the legitimacy of federally control lands within their State. It also proves that the people have the courage to stand against despotic government actions. The purpose of the federal government is to protect and uphold the rights of the people, not to profit from the spoils in taking their lands and resources away.

The recent action of the BLM in creating new federal code (ACECs) to expand their control and power by restricting the people further from their lands is a continuation of illegally controlling land with-in a State.


We call upon our County and State representatives to take courage and end the unconstitutional federal control of land and resources within the State. The legal and rightful control of the land belongs to the local people. The land within the State must be returned to people in a republic form of government. It is time for the State to dispose of the land to the people, open the land up for useful purposes, and protect the preemptive property rights of the people.

Lest there be any confusion regarding how these new federal rules impact the Bundy family, we will continue ranching as our family has done in the Southern Nevada area for over 137 years. We intend to use our preemptive property rights of grazing and water, the rights that Nevada State law both recognizes and is charged to protect.

We are not intimidated by the past action of the federal government, nor will we yield to their future attempt to subdue the State or the people. We refuse to submit to unconstitutional codes and regulation that dismantle Statehood and deprived our American neighbors and ourselves of the unalienable right so many of our kinsmen suffered and died for.

The Bundy Family

October 25, 2014

Bundy Graph

Bundy Graph 2

The next ninety days will no doubt be frought with drama, intrigue and environmental sensationalism.

Ann Wagner Runs For Her Second Of Three Terms . . .


. . . or more?

Screen Shot 2014-11-04 at 10.53.08 AM

In a drive-by appearance, at my local Pachyderm club, Ann Wagner stopped in to campaign for her second term, to a roomfull of faithful Republicans and said all the right things. “When Republicans take the Senate, we will see a turn around Obamacare, the EPA, yada, yada.” All points well received.

Campaign promises are kind of the focal point, today, as most conservatives hope to see a Republican Senate takeover. Does a Senate take over mean that Republicans will at least work to undo the damage of the last 6 years? And, in Ann’s case, will there be enough time?

In 2012 Wagner signed a pledge, by TermLimits.org, promising to run for only 3 terms, as she proclaimed in 2012, that she would not become a career politician.

Here, on her website, is a press release of her support of Congressional term limits and screen shots, just incase the site gets scrubbed in 2018.

Screen Shot 2014-11-04 at 10.46.31 AM

Screen Shot 2014-11-04 at 10.47.16 AM

The reason for my point is: when I asked the Congresswoman if she signed such a pledge, she denied it and emphatically and enthusiastically delcaired she will continue to run for her seat. While she has two terms left before she is in conflict with her 2012 promises, memories seem to be fogging over, in only 2 years. Stay tuned.

Evidence Proves Key Demographics Have Made a Right Turn


Ask anyone running for Congress or higher office and they’ll tell you they want to reach millennial voters. They were a key demographic for President Obama’s 2008 victory and typically, voter turnout for that generation is rather low.

While it’s sometimes assumed that youth skew Left, things are actually changing. A new National Harvard Youth Poll shows that millennial voters prefer a Republican Congress by four percent right now.

Today’s youth were sold Obama’s promises but have gradually realized they were empty, even until the end. With only two years left under Obama, young people are reconsidering what they want in the next decade of their lives.

And it’s not just youth. Poll after poll has shown that key demographics are positioning themselves as swing voters or to the Right.

An Associated Press-Gfk poll showed that female voters are split almost dead even between Democrats and Republicans.

Despite the Democrats’ “war on women” rhetoric, many female voters have seen beyond it. The Left most often appeals to women on the basis of sex, birth control and abortion. It seems some young women have finally recognized how degrading and sexist that actually is.

Who else is eyeing the Right? Hispanics. A Pew Research Center poll showed that Hispanics are moving toward the GOP in higher numbers than ever. The same poll showed that 54% of registered Hispanic voters would vote for someone who disagrees with them on immigration reform, providing they share their views on most other issues.

The Left has many talking points for women, young people and minority communities – but they do very little besides spend lots of money in ways that are ineffective in the long run.

The cultural definition of what it means to be a Democrat has evolved from moderate to extreme Left – and these demographics may be realizing that’s not a place they want to be.

Making The Rounds On Alternative Media To Get The Word Out On No Diehl


Thanks to Paul Ellison of Guerilla Radio-American Spring for having me on to spread the word about the NO DIEHL campaign. The mainstream media won’t tell you about this. You won’t even hear about it from the so-called conservative media. Why, because they may be more tied in to the establishment Republican Party than they are willing to admit to conservative grassroots audiences. It takes a turn to alternative media to get to the truth on the issues.

Listen to the podcast HERE!

Why Ann Wagner Is Wrong to Attack Heritage Action


Original Post: Why Ann Wagner Is Wrong to Attack Heritage Action.

Accountability? We don’t need no stinking accountability. No, Ann Wagner didn’t actually say that. But her comments to a 2nd District Republican committee meeting on Tuesday gave at least one attendee the impression that Mrs. Wagner opposes the idea of conservatives holding Congress accountable. Ann Wagner Attacks the Conservative Heritage Action Rep. Ann Wagner accused…

The post Why Ann Wagner Is Wrong to Attack Heritage Action appeared first on Hennessy's View.

3 Simple Questions for Chairman Priebus


Original Post: 3 Simple Questions for Chairman Priebus.

On Saturday, I raised a concern about Erick Erickson’s handling of Reince Priebus at Erickson’s annual RedState Gathering. Today, Erick responded to widespread criticism of his decision to protect the GOP Chairman from questions about tactics in the Mississippi Republican Senate Runoff. Here’s the heart of Erickson’s answer: But there was more to it than…

The post 3 Simple Questions for Chairman Priebus appeared first on Hennessy's View.

The 40th Anniversary of Nixon’s Resignation Feels Like Déjà Vu

Nixon announces resignation

On August 9, 1974, Richard Nixon resigned the Presidency.

Nixon announces resignation

Richard Nixon reads his resignation speech August 8, 1974.

Here’s the second article of impeachment approved by the House Judiciary Committee that led to Nixon’s resignation. See if any of this sounds familiar.

Article 2: Abuse of Power.

Using the powers of the office of President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in disregard of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has repeatedly engaged in conduct violating the constitutional rights of citizens, imparting the due and proper administration of justice and the conduct of lawful inquiries, or contravening the laws governing agencies of the executive branch and the purposes of these agencies. This conduct has included one or more of the following:

(1) He has, acting personally and through his subordinated and agents, endeavored to obtain from the Internal Revenue Service, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, confidential information contained in income tax returns for purposes not authorized by law, and to cause, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, income tax audits or other income tax investigation to be initiated or conducted in a discriminatory manner.

(2) He misused the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secret Service, and other executive personnel, in violation or disregard of the constitutional rights of citizens, by directing or authorizing such agencies or personnel to conduct or continue electronic surveillance or other investigations for purposes unrelated to national security, the enforcement of laws, or any other lawful function of his office; he did direct, authorize, or permit the use of information obtained thereby for purposes unrelated to national security, the enforcement of laws, or any other lawful function of his office; and he did direct the concealment of certain records made by the Federal Bureau of Investigation of electronic surveillance.

(3) He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, in violation or disregard of the constitutional rights of citizens, authorized and permitted to be maintained a secret investigative unit within the office of the President, financed in part with money derived from campaign contributions to him, which unlawfully utilized the resources of the Central Intelligence Agency, engaged in covert and unlawful activities, and attempted to prejudice the constitutional right of an accused to a fair trial.

(4) He has failed to take care that the laws were faithfully executed by failing to act when he knew or had reason to know that his close subordinates endeavored to impede and frustrate lawful inquiries by duly constituted executive; judicial and legislative entities concerning the unlawful entry into the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee, and the cover-up thereof, and concerning other unlawful activities including those relating to the confirmation of Richard Kleindienst as attorney general of the United States, the electronic surveillance of private citizens, the break-in into the office of Dr. Lewis Fielding, and the campaign financing practices of the Committee to Re-elect the President.

(5) In disregard of the rule of law: he knowingly misused the executive power by interfering with agencies of the executive branch: including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Criminal Division and the Office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force of the Department of Justice, in violation of his duty to take care that the laws by faithfully executed.

In all of this, Richard M. Nixon has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

Wherefore Richard M. Nixon, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.

(Approved 28-10 by the House Judiciary Committee on Monday, July 29, 1974.)

source: The History Place

For the record, I am not asking the House of Representatives to draft articles of impeachment on Barack Obama. But I have ask: is there more than a dime’s difference between Obama and Nixon? Or is it just a matter of the press failing to do its job in the 21st century?

Why Is Erick Erickson Protecting Reince Priebus?

photo 2
Original Post: Why Is Erick Erickson Protecting Reince Priebus?. Call it the hand of God. I was supposed to go to RedState Gathering this weekend, but things didn’t work out at the list minute. Now, I’m glad I wasn’t there. Red State Gathering is blogger Erick Erickon’s annual conservative gabfest. This year, it was in Ft. Worth, Texas. Reince Priebus, RNC Chairman, was one… The post Why Is Erick Erickson Protecting Reince Priebus? appeared first on Hennessy's View.