One Response to “Forcing Congress’s Hand”

Comments

Read below or add a comment...

  1. Vote -1

    This author sadly and obviously does not know what he is talking about. A simple Google of Article V convention cold have saved him the embarrassment.

    He states Randy Barnett came up with the idea of “forcing” the hand of Congress to propose amendments and that the author doubts two thirds of the states (34) would apply for a convention.

    Wrong.

    According to public record, all 50 states have submitted 750 applications for an Article V Convention, well in excess of the 34 needed and obviously over two thirds of the states have applied for such a convention. The texts of the applications can be read at http://www.foavc.org.

    Therefore, as Mr. Barnett discovered which is why he has stopped urging his so-called strategy, there is no way to “force” Congress to call a convention based on the “threat” of applications as the two-thirds mark was reached long ago. Simply put, Congress must call a convention as specified by Article V and anyone discussing the subject, including the author of this article, should begin discussion from that point.

    The fact is the states have already acted boldly as he states. But opponents to obeying the Constitution have everyone convinced a convention will write a new Constitution and doom life on earth as we know it. The author points out correctly this is incorrect. It is time to bring pressure on Congress and ask them by what right they claim to veto the Constitution. For more on this aspect see FAQ 9.1 on the FOAVC website.

Follow stlteaparty on Twitter

Switch to our mobile site